- 動画数
- 2,569
- チャンネル登録者
- 1270万
- 総再生回数
- 38.7億
- 最新のアップロード
- 2026/11/14
- 独立ページ
- News Explainers
- コンテンツの言語: 英語
- 地域: アメリカ合衆国
これは Youtop が運営する独立したディレクトリページです。Vox や YouTube が運営・後援・承認しているものではありません。 修正を提案する. このクリエイター本人ですか？ページを申請する
Loading
これは Youtop が運営する独立したディレクトリページです。Vox や YouTube が運営・後援・承認しているものではありません。 修正を提案する. このクリエイター本人ですか？ページを申請する
Vox · 2018年8月7日 公開
Fingerprinting is used by law enforcement all over the world, but it may not be as reliable as you think. Subscribe to our channel! http://goo.gl/0bsAjO Fingerprinting has been a vital tool in forensic science since 1911 when the first conviction was handed out based on fingerprint evidence. It’s been used in countless investigations to help convict or rule out suspects, but is it as reliable as we think? According to one study, researchers found that fingerprint analysts had a false positive rate (i.e. when they incorrectly conclude two prints are a match) of 0.1%. That may seem low, but that percentage reveals that innocent people are still being implicated in crimes. Brandon Mayfield is one of the most famous examples of a false positive identification. The FBI arrested him for the 2004 Madrid train bombing based on a wrongful fingerprint match. Most people agree that it’s a useful tool, but we might want to exercise a bit more skepticism when it comes to trusting fingerprints. Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what's really driving the events in the headlines. Check out http://www.vox.com. Watch our full video catalog: http://goo.gl/IZONyE Follow Vox on Facebook: http://goo.gl/U2g06o Or Twitter: http://goo.gl/XFrZ5H
