이 페이지는 Youtop이 운영하는 독립 디렉터리 페이지입니다. CrashCourse 또는 YouTube가 운영, 후원, 보증하지 않습니다. 수정 제안하기. 이 크리에이터 본인이신가요? 페이지 소유 신청
Loading
이 페이지는 Youtop이 운영하는 독립 디렉터리 페이지입니다. CrashCourse 또는 YouTube가 운영, 후원, 보증하지 않습니다. 수정 제안하기. 이 크리에이터 본인이신가요? 페이지 소유 신청
CrashCourse · 2015년 7월 10일 게시
Today, Craig Benzine is going to dive into the factors that influence judicial decisions. As you may have noticed, the Supreme Court recently handed down some pretty big decisions on same-sex marriage (in Obergefell v Hodges) and the Affordable Care Act (in King v. Burwell). Now, it's important to remember that these decisions are not made in a vacuum, but influenced by the other branches of government, political affiliations, and past court decisions. We’re also talk about a judge’s judicial philosophy - that is their relative restraint or activism in making decisions on laws. Judicial restraint is often equated with conservatism, but as we’ll show you, this is not always the case. Produced in collaboration with PBS Digital Studios: http://youtube.com/pbsdigitalstudios Support is provided by Voqal: http://www.voqal.org All attributed images are licensed under Creative Commons by Attribution 2.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/legalcode Want to find Crash Course elsewhere on the internet? Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/YouTubeCrashCourse Twitter - http://www.twitter.com/TheCrashCourse Tumblr - http://thecrashcourse.tumblr.com Support Crash Course on Patreon: http://patreon.com/crashcourse CC Kids: http://www.youtube.com/crashcoursekids
