Numberphile
Videos about numbers and mathematics. Videos by Brady Haran since 2011.
- 视频数
- 834
- 订阅者
- 479万
- 总观看次数
- 7.4亿
- 最新上传
- 2026年11月12日
- 独立页面
- 数学
- 内容语言: 英语
这是 Youtop 运营的独立目录页面,并非由 Numberphile 或 YouTube 运营、赞助或认可。 YouTube 官方频道 ↗提交更正你是这位创作者吗?认领此页面
Videos about numbers and mathematics. Videos by Brady Haran since 2011.
这是 Youtop 运营的独立目录页面,并非由 Numberphile 或 YouTube 运营、赞助或认可。 YouTube 官方频道 ↗提交更正你是这位创作者吗?认领此页面
Numberphile · 发布于 2016年7月18日
More links & stuff in full description below ↓↓↓ A prime number problem posed by Fermat that has been proved multiple times - including a famous proof using one just sentence. See the next video (proof) at: https://youtu.be/yGsIw8LHXM8 This video features Professor Matthias Kreck from the University of Bonn. See him discuss wobbly tables: https://youtu.be/OuF-WB7mD6k Prime Number Videos: http://bit.ly/primevids Support us on Patreon: http://www.patreon.com/numberphile NUMBERPHILE Website: http://www.numberphile.com/ Numberphile on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/numberphile Numberphile tweets: https://twitter.com/numberphile Subscribe: http://bit.ly/Numberphile_Sub Numberphile is supported by the Mathematical Sciences Research Institute (MSRI): http://bit.ly/MSRINumberphile Videos by Brady Haran Brady's videos subreddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/BradyHaran/ Brady's latest videos across all channels: http://www.bradyharanblog.com/ Sign up for (occasional) emails: http://eepurl.com/YdjL9 Numberphile T-Shirts: https://teespring.com/stores/numberphile Other merchandise: https://store.dftba.com/collections/numberphile Hey, why did you make this two videos and not just one? Because two videos would have been very long and deterred casual viewers from even learning about the problem. Makes more sense to make a video which describes the problem and the solution, plus its history and the fact a one sentence proof exists... then have a more technical second video for people who want to see the proof itself. I have made links to the second video as clear as possible and I suspect more technical fans subscribe to Numberphile2 anyway. Correction: At 4:08 the number at the bottom should be the prime 23, not 22...